![]() Fortunately, though, there are contacts willing to divulge – either on- or off-record – their teams’ financials for reasons best known to them. Then, Ferrari does not split its finances – either within the group or within Gestione Sportiva – as does Mercedes’ F1 team, which operates separate engine and chassis operations. The financial records of non-UK domiciled operations – Ferrari and Toro Rosso (both Italy), Sauber (Switzerland) and Haas (international) – are not publicly accessible, and thus best guesstimates have been applied where teams have been uncooperative for whatever reasons.Īdvert | Become a RaceFans supporter and go ad-free Although these returns provide a solid basis, they need to be purified, for not all operations are dedicated solely to F1. #720P F1 2019 PLUS#The first component is easy to obtain, being available once the championship classification is declared ‘final’ the second requires voluminous research – whether into financial records or via interviews – plus good old-fashioned sleuthing.Ĭompanies House returns are available for all UK-based teams, and thus the financials of Mercedes, Red Bull Racing, McLaren, Renault, Racing Point and Williams are all (eventually) in the public domain – albeit up to nine months in arrears. Thus, the true measure of any team’s effectiveness is not its eventual championship classification, but the ratio between the number of points scored during a season and the particular team’s overall budget, effectively its Bang for Buck. #720P F1 2019 FULL#The nature of this sporting business means that for every constructors champion there are a number of also-rans for whom the challenge lies in achieving the best possible performance over a full season within the constraints of their respective budgets. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]()
#Nozbe vs producteev androidMy biggest turn-off was their New Android app. #Nozbe vs producteev for macThe brownish UI for Mac just doesn’t work, I can’t quite put my finger on it, is it because the colour palette looks like something off a toddlers app? I’m not sure. This is for you, if you after an app that looks good, supports many platforms (Playbook and Nook included), don’t mind Adobe Air and are not too bothered that it doesn’t look/work like anything you’ve used before.įor the high price it has to be the best and I don’t think it is (yet). #Nozbe vs producteev plusPlus missing features, like task recurrences (essential for doing stuff like monthly accounts) and Google calendar sync puts this one out of the running. The odd UI and it’s clunky-ness is just something that would grate on me after a time, it bewildered me in the short time I used it. This is for you, if you after an app that has great looks, fantastic simple UX, same experience across multiple platforms and are happy with basic task organisation. With its drag ‘n’ drop task ordering (something surprisingly missing on most), it makes easy just-in-time ordering of the next tasks to do in a project, so it might remain as part of the system. Although there might be reprieve for this, as I’ve been using it for a while for my work tasks for Life Tuned and Pik Pak, in a kind of personal Kanban. I love Wunderlists simplicity and looks but the lack of tags or appearing in more than one list, means no contexts. So it’s not that the runners up are bad apps, it’s just that the others were better, sometimes marginally. All of them had at least one thing wrong or missing. There wasn’t a single one that looked like a clear winner. It was really hard to choose my apps to make up my trusted system.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |